Foreskin activist calls for genital awareness
Have you ever seen a man put a grape inside his foreskin? How about nine of them? That’s exactly what Glen Callender of the Canadian Foreskin Awareness Project (CAN FAP) does to catch the audience’s attention at the beginning of his foreskin demonstration.
CAN FAP is an advocacy group dedicated to “foreskin education, appreciation and stimulation.”
“[We] advocate for the right of all children, male, female, and intersex to grow up with intact genitalia, and decide for themselves if they want to have medically unnecessary surgery performed on their genitals,” said Callender.
“The amputation of sex organs is a big deal and it’s something that as a culture we don’t want to face, and it’s really time for it to be faced.”
The project launched on June 20, Father’s Day, a deliberate move on Callender’s part. He hopes that one day CAN FAP will be “considered the greatest Father’s Day present that Canada ever received.”
There are several reasons Callender is advocating for foreskin awareness. According to Callender, males with foreskin experience more sexual pleasure than their circumcised counterparts.
“[My foreskin] is very sensitive, it brings me a lot of pleasure. It brings me orgasms, specific orgasms that you don’t get from other places,” he said. “I even have multiple orgasms from stimulating my foreskin, which is very rare in men.”
Callender believes that there is no medical reason for circumcision, and it is practiced purely for cultural or religious reasons.
“It’s so bizarre that in our culture we’re trying to prop up this absurd purely cultural double standard where we say, ‘Oh, genital cutting is bad for girls but it’s good for boys.’ That’s frankly nonsense,” he said. “It’s merely something that’s propped up by over a century of ignorance and an old fad from Victorian England that hasn’t washed itself out of the system.”
However, not everyone is on board with CAN FAP’s message. Rabbi Barak Cohen from UVic’s Multifaith Services, addressed some of the claims made on CAN FAP’s website.
“With regards to the necessity of [circumcision]? I don’t know. I mean I understand someone who’s not coming from a Jewish perspective, or also Muslims practice this as well, I would understand why they would not want to go through this procedure,” he said.
Cohen said there are some medical benefits to circumcision, such as studies that have shown it reduces HIV transmission rates in Africa.
“There are those who believe that medically it does have benefits. There are those who say those benefits are so small they wouldn’t go through such a procedure,” he said. “It’s an issue of what do we, as parents, have a right to do to children, for what we think is the best for them. Again, there’s two things – there’s religiously, if you’re a Jew or a Muslim, and physically, if you’re a human being.”
Immunizations are given to children for health benefits despite the fact that they’re uncomfortable, said Cohen. He added that while there may be minor benefits to circumcision that some parents feel are worth the procedure, for a Jew the benefits go beyond the physical.
One of those is a commandment called brit milah, which translates as “covenant of… circumcision,” said Cohen. “It’s this relationship that God entered into with Abraham through this ritual.”
Cohen acknowledges that some believe religious circumcision should be saved until the age of majority. “In theory that is a valid point — the only thing is that the ritual ... becomes that much more complicated and is that much more painful when you’re older,” said Cohen. “To an eight-month-old baby, it’s not much of a procedure.”
However, Cohen disagrees.
Callender says that with his personality and foreskin demonstrations, he and CAN FAP are in a position to bring a lot of awareness to circumcision.
“As a front man for CAN FAP, I will be doing a puppetry of the penis-type thing. It’s evolving very quickly,” Callender said. It certainly is an evocative performance, moving from the initial “guess-how-many-grapes” attention-grabber to a more informative presentation on foreskin hygiene, pleasure and other topics.
Callender plans to take CAN FAP on a campus tour and hopes that both those who agree and those who disagree with his cause will attend. He’s going to visit Lower Mainland campuses in the fall, and hopes to later come to UVic.
Callender has already taken the project to several Pride events. The queer community, according to Callender, knows “what it feels like to be repressed sexually, especially by an old book of fairy tales.”

5 Comments
The Martlet has an open comments policy and will endeavour to promote healthy discussion. We strive to act as an agent of constructive social change and will remove racist, sexist, homophobic, or otherwise oppressive comments.
Leave a Comment
Hugh7 Sept. 20, 2010, 12:21 a.m.
Rabbi Cohen is right that "It’s an issue of what do we, as parents, have a right to do to children, for what we think is the best for them." And we have no right to cut any other normal, healthy, functional, non-renewable part off our children's bodies. Why this anomaly? In fact, the most nearly corresponding part of little girls' bodies gets special legal protection - even from parents who think cutting it off "is the best for them". Why the double standard?
He is simply wrong that "the ritual ... becomes that much more complicated and is that much more painful when you’re older". Neonatal circumcision is microsurgery, and the tiniest mistake is magnified manyfold in the adult. An adult can monitor his own pain-relief as a baby cannot. "To an eight-month [eight-day?]-old baby, it’s not much of a procedure.” On the contrary, studies have shown that the pain of neonatal circumcision is akin to that of torture, that their bodies remember it for months, and that sugar (the usual pacifier at ritual circumcisions) makes the face relax but does not relieve the pain.
Newcomers to the subject; Callender is an outlier in the Genital Autonomy movement (Intactivism), and the great majority are involved in this human rights issue in much more impersonal ways.
James Loewen Sept. 22, 2010, 3:32 a.m.
Three cheers for CAN FAP and the human rights of genital integrity to all children!
Rabbi Cohen suggests some people "believe" circumcision has medical benefits. If Cohen "believes" that cutting part of his penis off will benefit him medically then he should allowed to do that, to himself!
The barbaric practice of cutting the genitals of children too young to understand or consent is a violation of their human rights. Those who have been violated in this manner generally impose the same abuse upon their children. When they feel they have religious justification for this abuse then rational thought isn't even allowed to enter the discussion.
Thankfully there is now a ton of easily accessible information available on genital integrity for parents to find the truth on this issue. Thanks to Glen Callender for helping to bring this human rights issue forward!
Unhappily Cut Eric Sept. 22, 2010, 4:37 a.m.
What Rabbi Cohen fails to understand is that unlike an infant, an adult can CONSENT and can DECIDE for himself whether or not circumcision would be beneficial to him and whether or not to undergo the procedure before the fact. Also when it is done to an adult, they at least have the decency to put them under while it's being done. Yes I'll bet it probably is very painful afterwards but name a surgery (medically necessary or not) that isn't? Brest implant's, penis enlargement surgery, Botox injections, nose jobs, liposuctions etc are all surgeries than adults consent to undergo that have painful recovery periods afterwards yet no one would argue that they should be performed on unconsenting infants . An intact (uncircumcised) adult always has the option of getting circumcised if he so chooses . As a man who would not have been circumcised had it rightfully been my choice, what options do I have? Stretch some skin from the shaft of my penis over a few years in a vain attempt get back a small piece of what was taken from me against my will? On top of that I live everyday with the pain of knowing that my penis as well as any feelings of pleasure that I get from it where made the way that they are because I was strapped down to a plastic restraining device and quite literally deflowered in an act of what I consider to be surgical rape! That's only a taste of how I feel when I see that disgusting scar where my foreskin should be! Perhaps people like Rabbi Cohen and others who ignorantly support circumcision while downplaying, dismissing or outright ignoring it's negative consequences should consider that there's no such thing as a "de-circumcision" before blindly considering it as a parent's choice like some babbling idiot who wouldn't know human rights if it hit him in the balls!
SteveB Sept. 22, 2010, 5:14 a.m.
"Infant male circumcision was once considered a preventive health measure and was therefore adopted extensively in Western counties. Current understanding of the benefits, risks and potential harm of this procedure, however, no longer supports this practice for prophylactic health benefit. Routine infant male circumcision performed on a healthy infant is now considered a non‐therapeutic and medically unnecessary intervention."
College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia https://www.cpsbc.ca/files/u6/Circumcision-Infant-Male.pdf
Steve B Sept. 22, 2010, 5:19 a.m.
"Infant male circumcision was once considered a preventive health measure and was therefore adopted extensively in Western counties. Current understanding of the benefits, risks and potential harm of this procedure, however, no longer supports this practice for prophylactic health benefit. Routine infant male circumcision performed on a healthy infant is now considered a non‐therapeutic and medically unnecessary intervention."
College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia
https://www.cpsbc.ca/files/u6/Circumcision-Infant-Male.pdf